Welcome to Julia's Site!

This blog is made available for several reasons. First and foremost, to keep those that know Julia current with what is going on with her and her progress. It is also my intention to educate those who do not know Julia about what happened to her, so they can make educated decisions about their own children. I want to welcome those of you with questions about her disease, treatments, and just the general life (the good and the bad) of living with a brain damaged child. Finally, it is a therapeutic release for me, Julia's mom, Susan. I love writing and need to get some of this stuff out of my head and onto "paper". Thank you!

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

New therapists today

Today Julia switched locations and times of her therapies. She is starting the evaluation to decide which communication device would be most appropriate for her and the therapist that is best for this job is in Littleton - so we changed to this location. I was lucky enough to also be able to schedule OT the same day and around the same time, so we can get those two therapies done in one shot. Her OT is a man named Kevin. He seemed really nice and very animated, which Julia loves, so I think it will be a good relationship for Julia. Kevin gave Shawn and I all kinds of ideas of different things to try with her. I think it was good to have a "new" pair of eyes on Julia to give both her and I new ways to look at things. I am real excited about Julia and I getting to know Kevin. After OT, Julia went on to ST with her new therapist Lisa. Julia was shown a couple of different communication devices and she worked with her on both. Lisa thought she did relatively well, with it being her first session. So I am excited to see how this progresses and to get her and I trained to the device.

I discussed the issue with public vs private school with her OT and he seemed to think the private was definately worth looking into - with all the therapy that they incorporate into the school, so we are cancelling next weeks sessions so we can go check out the Rise School and see what its all about. The link is attached for anyone who might be interested.

Susan

http://www.riseschool.org/denver

Again, don't know why my links stopped working - copy and paste if interested......I'm trying to figure this out!

Monday, September 28, 2009

Public school or private....

Julia had her IEP meeting last week. I have always hated those meetings - i always attended them alone and was always so overwhelmed that I would just say yes to whatever the team decided were her goals with very little personal input. Well, this year I had some support and things went well, I believe. Julia's case worker, Anne, with Developmental pathways came with me, along with my mom and Shawn. I went over all of my concerns with Julia with them and they told me about her progress since last year. I was surprised to hear a lot of what they said, as it is not what we see at home, but I guess in a structured environment, she behaves a little better than at home where it is a free for all!

Anyway, Anne, acting as my "advocate" did say she was pretty impressed with the organization of the school team working with Julia. However, she was not that impressed with the amount of time dedicated to OT and ST during the week. She suggested that I check into a "special needs" preschool, one that I had already signed Julia up for, but was told there was a year long wait list. Well, just an hour before Julia's meeting on Friday, the private school (The Rise School in Denver) called to say they had an unexpected opening....I called the school today and they do provide so much more as far as therapy. They provide, PT, OT, ST, and Music therapy. The program is five days a week from 8am to 230pm. Much more intensive, which equals much more expensive...but if it will help her, I have some money saved and I'm sure there are others who will help out, even if she just goes for a year or two during this "window" that we have with early intervention. The window starts "closing" at about age 5 - 6 years, and she will be four in December. I spoke with Julia's Life Care Planner hired by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to see if Julia's settlement would cover this private school, as the school does so much with therapies, but she said it would not. This confuses me and I will talk to her and her attorney Ron Homer when they come out to see Julia in November. It seems odd that they would cover residential placement for her, but not a school designed to hopefully keep her OUT of residential placement....anyway, I will know more later I guess.

Anyway, lots of decisions to make. I am going out to the Rise School next Tuesday to check it out, and then hope to observe at Julia's regular school and see if there is a significant difference.

Anne has agreed to go with me to the Rise School to give me her input. I am thankful for her help.

Susan

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

My initial thought for Julia's IEP meeting in a couple weeks....time to tell THEM how it is and what she needs!

Julia Grimes

Julia is a very caring, sensitive, little girl who seems to know more than many may give her credit for. Her sense of humor is evident even with her lack of ability to verbally communicate. She is very resilient considering her disabilities and tries hard to progress despite multiple hurdles.

Julia seems to want to communicate her wants and needs with others - family members, other kids, and wants to make friends. She is getting extremely frustrated with her inability to communicate her needs, which is causing her to appear "unhappy" with crying and tantrums,when really, I believe she is just frustrated. Julia's significant cognitive delays/dysfunctions, and serious deficits in the areas of communication and attention are very much impacting her life, at school, daycare, and even at home.

Social Skills:
1. Julia lacks understanding of typical "play" for a four year old. She engages in a more one sided type of play, or sometimes parallel play - more commonly seen in children significantly younger than Julia.
2. Julia lacks the ability to focus or attend to a task for more than about one minute, as noted by both her neurologist, Dr. Julie Parsons, and her Speech Evaluator, Tracy Kovach. This affects her ability to participate in groups during school time, and her ability to entertain herself at home unsupervised for any period of time without getting frustrated.
3. Julia is unable to follow more complex instructions, though can occasionally follow simple one task commands if engaged one on one.
4. Julia does not understand the "boundaries" of play or social interaction as most typical four year old do. She acts in play and social situations as a child significantly younger, for example stealing toys, eating food off of others plates, dumping food off of plates, not using utensils with any regularity, inability to drink from a regular cup, not sharing and getting upset when a toy, etc is taken from her. She is known to walk up to kids and just touch their bodies or their hair, often with her hands that are wet with slobber, which upsets other children.
5. Julia does not always know how to respond appropriately to others feelings - she will often cry if another child ignores her or tells her no or seems upset with her. When I, her mother, am upset at home (angry), she often just cries, or if I, her mother am sad, she disregards the feelings and goes about wandering. However, when others around her are happy, she does often respond favorably with a laugh and a smile.
6. When frustrated or over stimulated, Julia will cry and often has been throwing tantrums (throwing herself on the floor). The only thing I have found that helps with this is to let her wander which helps her unwind, but is not appropriate in most social situations.
7. Julia's speech therapists have noted that Julia's receptive language very far exceeds her expressive language. This need to be taken into consideration when dealing with Julia, as she does understand a lot of what is said to her, she just is unable to let you know that she understands.
8. Julia does not seem to me to understand rules very clearly. Perhaps this is just a cognitive delay and her being in her terrible two's (though she is almost four), or perhaps it is due to her brain injury and cognitive dysfunction.

Julia's social deficits result in her being constantly frustrated. She does not understand why she is unable to play with other children in the way that they play - playing outside with toys, tricycles, running, etc. She is frustrated when she is "forced" to sit in one place to participate in activities as was noted by speech pathologist, Tracy Kovach, and as is seen by me, Julia's mother, and I assume her teachers at school. Julia's inability to communicate leaves her extremely frustrated, causing her to cry often and be upset, which upsets everyone around her, including friends, her brother, Jack, and her other family members. We are ALL frustrated and want to somehow help this issue dramatically.

Sensory Issues

9. Julia was noted by her speech pathologist and her neurologist, to have a very limited ability to concentrate on any one thing for more than a minutes time. This was seen as, in Julia's "world", she experiences everything going on around her all at once and is unable to differentiate or concentrate on any one thing at any given time. This makes it extremely difficult for Julia to participate in groups.
10. In contrast to most children who get overstimulated and need to be put in a quiet place to calm down; Julia, when overstimulated, usually calms herself down by wandering around until she is OK, however, as stated previously, in social settings this is not, and will not remain appropriate. .

Learning

12. It is difficult to assess Julia's learning or ability to learn with her being nonverbal.
13. Julia, at a neurology appointment in May 09, was noted to not imitate with drawing or coloring. She did not select colors consistently. She was not able to count any numbers.
14. In OT, PT, and ST, Julia is very inconsistent with placing puzzle pieces in the correct place. She is not consistent with a shape sorter, however, often she will hold up the correct shape to the correct hole in the sorter, but cannot get it in without assistance.
15. Julia has shown improvement in her response to simple commands, ie "put this in the trash", put the bowl in the sink", "give the remote to mommy", and similar commands. However, more complex understanding of following more than one step commands is lacking.
16. Is there a way to assess her IQ at such a young age with her being nonverbal?
17. She did not reach many (any?) of her goals from her last initial IEP meeting which is of great concern to me.

Life Care Skills
18. Julia is unable to dress herself, or even help to pull her pants up and down, or help to take her shirt off. I would like to see her improve somewhat in this area.
19. Julia is not toilet trained, though does show an interest in watching others use the toilet. Perhaps this could be an opportunity for her to learn to pull her pants up and down, if brought to the potty once a day, even if she does not use it.
20. Julia is unable to put shoes or socks on by herself. She can remove her shoes and socks no problem, but cannot put them on. She does show interest in doing this.
21. Julia fights to have her teeth brushed. Is there anything that could be done about this at school, ie - books about it to look at, or having someone help her with it after snack to somehow make it "fun" for her.
22. Julia does not know how to appropriately brush her hair, though does make an effort to do so in bringing the brush to her head.



Overall Affects of Julia's Disability

23. Difficulty with motor skills - left sided hemiplegia, unable to manipulate playground equipment safely without supervision, still occasionally falls, unable to ride a bike or tricycle or other toy requiring organized movement of both legs and arms. Needs supervision with most physical activities, especially playground equipment, stairs, and steps. Safety cannot be overemphasized.
24. No organizational skills.
25. Little, if any, planning skills.
26. Extreme difficulty with sustained attention.
27. Difficulty in exerting mental control (crying outbursts, etc).
28. Extreme difficulty with concentration.
29. No fear of anything - no stranger danger, no fear of cars if walking outside, little fear of unknown animals, no fear of unusual situations or environments.
30. Being nonverbal is her biggest hurdle at this point. She needs a way to communicate and she wants to communicate. Her focus and attention span are equally important.


Strengths

Julia is a delightful, sweet girl when in a very structured environment with one on one support. It was recommended by her neurologist, Dr. Julie Parsons, that she be placed in a special structured school, such as The Rise School in Denver, which she believes would be most appropriate in helping her attention span immensely, and her family agrees. I have spoken to Mark Graham at The Rise School about Julia and she is on the waiting list. Our only issues about this at this point is transportation to get her there, as it is in Denver and I must work full time, and of course, the cost which is about $1000 to $1500 per month.

Julia has shown to have a very good sense of humor and appreciates humor in others and loves to laugh.

Julia has improved in her motor skills significantly over the last two years.

Julia has shown herself to be both physically strong, and more importantly, psychologically strong, in that she is very willing to TRY to help herself. She wants to improve.


Future hopes

The sky is the limit as far as I, her mother, am concerned. Realistically, I would love to see Julia progress to a point of being able to live independently at some point in her future. I would love to see Julia be able to hold down a job, live on her own or with support of caregivers, and be a productive member of society. Julia will always have the support of her family and her friends and we will provide for her whatever we can to reach these goals.

I respectfully request this written report be included in the written record of this meeting as part of my parental input.

Dr. Susan Lawson-Grimes

Friday, September 11, 2009

need i say more................

Cognitive and Phenomenological Perspectives

Other perspectives that might be helpful in understanding grief and loss are related to questions of meaning and adaptation to changed circumstances.

Marris (1974) argues that a major loss or bereavement "shatters the structure of meaning" and "breaks the thread of continuity which makes the world intelligible". Grieving can be best understood as a response to loss of meaning. In the case of disability, parents are forced to embark on a dual process of learning a new world while simultaneously building purpose and meaning around their child's disability. This process represents an ongoing task with greater and lesser challenges throughout their child's lifespan.



Grief Work

In grief work it is thought that mourning may not proceed until there is a clear image of what is lost. The psychoanalytical approach suggests that in order to facilitate the process parents require an opportunity to review their thoughts and feelings about the "wished-for child". For parents of children with disability, the loss continues to evolve; the grief work is necessarily more complex and ongoing.

Worden (1991) outlines a range of thoughts, feelings, behaviours and physical symptoms associated with grieving. These experiences may be useful to consider as typical responses that might accompany grieving. In the case of disability, it is conceivable that parents will experience various intensities and permutations throughout their lifespan, including:

Thoughts, such as disbelief, confusion, preoccupation.
Feelings, such as anxiety and fear, sadness, anger, guilt, inadequacy, hurt, relief, loneliness.
Behaviours, such as sleep disturbances, appetite disturbances, absent-minded behaviour, social withdrawal, dreams, avoiding reminders, searching and calling out, restless overactivity, crying.
Physical symptoms, such as hollowness in the stomach, tightness in the chest, tightness in the throat, over- sensitivity to noise, a sense of depersonalisation, lack of energy.

Grief and Parenting a Child with Disability

The birth of a child with a disability may well challenge parents and extended family members who rail against the unfairness of it all, wonder how this could have happened to them and even ask why they are being punished. Those who wish to assist the family of a child with a disability need to understand what the experience means to its various members and not presume to know. Several authors have focused specifically on grieving as it affects parents of children with disability.

Chronic Sorrow

Olshansky (1962) challenged the relevance of bereavement-related grief in relation to its relevance to a child with a disability and introduced the notion of chronic sorrow. Olshansky's view is that parents need permission to grieve from time to time if that is how they feel. This sorrow can peak at critical times such as entry to kindergarten or birthdays, or any time when the parent is starkly reminded of the child's disability. Most parents with a disabled child suffer chronic sorrow throughout their lives. The intensity of this sorrow varies from time to time, from situation to situation, and from one family member to another. Some show their sorrow clearly, others attempt to conceal it as these feelings can be very difficult to share.

The sentence "The child's parents haven't yet accepted their son/daughter's disability" is heard and used many times by teachers, social workers, doctors and others. Olshansky suggests that when parents are asked to accept their child's disability it is not clear what they are being asked to do. The great emphasis professionals place on "acceptance" might suggest to the parents that they should perceive their child from the point of view of the professional helper not as "their" child. In this case, it is useful to differentiate between emotional and intellectual acceptance.

Another question professionals may ask is: "Why doesn't this parent want to have that assessment done?" It is often assumed that the parent is reluctant to move forward. Here, the notion of acceptance recurs again. Alternatively, from a grieving perspective, the response may indicate that the parent is overwhelmed and is trying to negotiate the pace at which they learn further about their child's disability. In many instances, where the child is not endangered, this may be considered emotionally adaptive.

The professional who sees chronic sorrow as a normal psychological reaction will support the parent over a long period of time in which the parent may adjust feelings and organise internal and external resources to meet their own and the child's needs. Rather than working inexorably towards the acceptance of the disability, the immediate goal is to increase the parent's level of comfort in living with the child and coping with the added difficulties this may present from day to day.

Adjustment and Readjustment

Helen Featherstone (1980) in her book A Difference in the Family refers to acceptance as the "emotional promised land". She suggests it may be more helpful to talk in terms of adjustment and readjustment as age and circumstances alter. She writes: "disability is never as clear cut as death. Grief usually mingles with confusion and uncertainty. As parents learn more, either through their own research or through professional consultation the picture changes. Too often earlier professional predictions are contradicted. Not knowing what fate to mourn, parents face a thousand alternative scenarios. Parents looking for a diagnosis are frightened and immensely vulnerable. They may have already suffered days, months, even years of agonising doubt. They stand exposed and powerless before the 'experts'. Indifference, condescension, or equivocation wound them deeply."

Unresolved Grief

In Australia, a recent study by Elizabeth Bruce (1991) and others has looked more fully at the concepts of grieving in relation to the parenting role. Bruce found that unresolved grief is better understood as a normal response rather than a failure or inadequacy on the part of the parent. That is, if we look at the complicated nature of loss, its changing perspectives over time, the problem of unresolved grief may not lie with the parent but in the constantly changing nature of the loss.

The nature of parental grief will be influenced by:

The social context which provides images of normality.
The disability and its manifestations.
The passage of time.

When the child's disability is diagnosed, the parent is forced to embark on two processes:

Learning exactly what has been lost.
The process of grieving.

In the past the literature has focused on the initial reactions to the impact of diagnosis, rather than the lifelong nature of loss. It is noted that as the child's uncertain future unfolds, the very maturation process can present further fear of the future, along with concerns about provision for the child when the parents are no longer able to provide care.

Implications of the Range of Theories in Relation to Disability:

Some Key Points

What have parents of a child with a disability lost?

The expected perfect child.
The normal parenting role and its impact over time.
The possible loss of an independent adult.

A further source of grief for the parent is the child's own sense of loss.

The isolation that families of a disabled child experience compounds their grief.

The stage theory of grief provides unrealistic tasks for parents of a disabled child.

Parents have a wide range of feelings and reactions, e.g. anger, jealousy, frustration, irritability, sleeplessness, resentment, hostility, abandonment, embarrassment, fear, blame and marital conflict. Although aspects of these feelings reflect a grieving response, they can also represent a realistic response to the lack of concrete information about their child's future, the lack of appropriate and responsive services, and the inappropriate reaction of family and social networks to the loss.
Parents describe the task of coping with a disabled child as surviving each day and holding on to their grief until later, or perhaps not being able to address it at all.

Summary of the Current Thinking About Grief and Loss

Grieving is a normal process in response to significant loss.
People need permission to grieve and to know their feelings are valid and normal.
Coping with loss is ongoing throughout the life cycle of the family.
Acceptance of the disability is an outmoded term and seen as an unrealistic goal for parents.
The notion of adjustment should be differentiated into intellectual and emotional aspects.
Time of diagnosis is not necessarily the only acute period of grieving. Acute periods can occur throughout the child's life.
Concern for the child's future in adulthood is often present at a very early age.
With any minor disorder or developmental delay, the reality of the child's condition may not be apparent for many years.
Difficult feelings of anger, envy, jealousy, and denial, etc. are part of the grieving process and professionals have a role in helping parents work through these feelings, even when they are projected towards them.
Grieving can be experienced by family members in quite different ways, e.g. one member distances from information while the other is keen to embrace all the information.
Grief may be triggered by parent's internal mood states, which are not predictable, eg. memories of their own childhood, music that creates nostalgia.
Involvement of professionals should be positive for families, who sometimes feel they have no choice in the professional's involvement in their lives.
Implications For Health Professionals in Their Practice

Recurring Grief

Professionals may overestimate the impact of the initial crisis of diagnosis and underestimate the later recurrent grief. A sudden image of the 'normal child' years later may trigger a grieving response. Parents may feel that they are not to mourn after the initial period but to become heroic dedicated care givers. Parents comment that people constantly remark "how wonderful you are" or "I would never have coped as well as you have". They often have to perform the role of supporting wider family members, which means their own painful feelings are ignored or left on hold.

Gender and Cultural Differences

These differences will be a determinant in an individual's response to grief. Ethnic disability services have an important contribution to make in assisting professionals understand the wide range of reactions to loss in specific cultures. The effects on various members of the family are often misunderstood. Male and female responses may be quite different and marital relationships can be strained if there is an expectation that partners must grieve together. The mother usually has more opportunities to talk to service providers, whereas the father may be left behind, keeping his feelings on hold. Parents need to be informed about how grieving responses vary for each individual and that siblings' needs must not be ignored, both in their experience of the disability and their changed family dynamics.

Parents and Professional Partnerships

Parents need professionals who can remain supportive over a long period. It is never enough to simply reassure parents that their grief is 'normal' and leave it at that. The grief might be normal but it is also painful and challenging. Support and understanding and opportunities to 'work through' the grief and adjustments are still needed. To pronounce the experience as normal is often dismissive and an abdication of professional responsibility.

Self-help groups are of enormous value and offer a special understanding and credibility that professionals who are not themselves parents of a child with a disability can never provide. Research in this area indicates that a partnership between professionals and self-help groups is even more effective than either in isolation.

Professionals need to be cautious in applying theories of grieving as fact. Suggesting parents need formal counselling might not be appropriate. Often what is needed is a trusting, stable relationship that offers choices in support and an understanding about change and loss reactions when the individuals are ready. Being able to support parents when they are angry, blaming, fearful, depressed or fighting each other is essential to the relationship of partnership with the family. Within this partnership, professionals often experience the anger and blame of parents towards them and their services. Being able to recognise these emotions and continue to work through the difficult times is a key example of how grief issues can impact on this partnership.

Staff Grieve Too

Members of the helping professions are not immune to grief. Exposure to a high volume of multiple and chronic loss situations can leave the professional feeling either helpless and overwhelmed, or so well defended as to seem callous and switched-off in dealing with families. Education about loss and grief, combined with communication skills training and an adequate system of support, debriefing and professional supervision, is essential for maintenance of high-quality patient, family and staff care. This approach has been successfully modelled in palliative care settings, but has barely begun to be developed in the acute health arena or disability related services.

The Parent-Child Relationship

Families may still experience many joys and satisfaction with their child and his or her progress, and love them intensely, even while grieving. The level of attachment of parent to their child is intense and complex and can exist despite severe disability, limited life expectancy and the burden of care the disability imposes. In fact, parents can react strongly to any negativity in the way their child is described.

Parents will feel a great deal of urgency to understand and cope with the child's condition. Bruce et al (1991) found that there were no significant differences in reports of happiness in parenting between the disabled and non-disabled group over the previous year, indicating the capacity for a satisfying experience of parenting any child. This conclusion is also indicative of the intense level of attachment of many parents.



Common Occasions of Stress For Families of a Child with a Disability, including Key Transition Times

The time of diagnosis of the disability or the time of acquiring the disability.
The time of discovery of additional disabilities e.g. hearing loss, epilepsy, diabetes.
Pre-school placement and school placement.
Puberty, sexual expression, adolescence.
When the child becomes aware of his/her disability/differences.
School leaving age and vocational or future work decisions.
Birthdays, Mother's Day, Father's Day, Christmas Day.
During a subsequent pregnancy or parental illness.
When siblings marry or establishment of responsibility of siblings in future care arrangements.
Permanent care application, waiting list and offer of placement.
Ageing of parents and death of a prime care giver.
Conclusion

For parents the diagnosis of disability in a child is a dreaded event. Its short and long-term effects shadow the parenting experience. The changes in hopes and expectations, the grief of parents, siblings and family can be seen to parallel the life of the child with disability. Depending on the presence and severity of the disability, this same child is likely to experience intermittent bouts of grief in varying intensity. Against this background, and given the constant stresses, parents are likely to be overwhelmed at various points. Family relationships can become strained, sometimes leading to parental separation and divorce. However, knowledge of normal grief reactions that recur across the lifespan of the family, and opportunities for expression of grief will lead to healthier adjustment and adaptation for families and careers.

The intense level of attachment of many parents to their children, the hard-fought individual achievements, and the improving level of integration into community life are also examples of parents' capacity for a rich and satisfying experience of parenting children with a disability.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Augmentative Communication Evaluation

Julia had her Augmentative Communication Evaluation this afternoon. It was a little over two hour appointment where the speech therapist evaluated her and made recommendations on assistive communication devices. She kind of narrowed it down to two different ones. (which range in price from $5,000 to $8,000). Julia seemed to catch on pretty quickly to each which was great. She says it will likely help her frustration level, and her aggravation, (and my frustration level and aggravation too!). We are going to get her set up for a further evaluation, and likely change her ST and OT to a different location where they can train her (and me) to use the device. This means I will once again have to revise my work schedule if possible, as they only have a few time slots open for this and it is in Highlands Ranch, not Parker.....I am going to ask work about it tomorrow....they have been nothing but great with my schedule so far, so hopefully they will work with me here. This means she will be out of PT for a while, but honestly, I think her mobility is fine (often TOO fine for her cognitive function!!!). Anyway, this therapist said she was very impressed with Julia's understanding of things that are said to her and thinks she is very intelligent...most of her problems stem from 1. an inability to focus her attention to anything, and 2. her lack of ability to communicate. I asked what she thought of her future ability to talk, and she said, once again, that she has no crystal ball, but she thinks her speech /(communication?) will get "better". That is about all she would say.

I am glad to hear she thinks Julia is cognitively more "there" than she appears. I am thankful there are devices to help her communicate. It was a relatively positive appointment.

Susan